How to Get Word to Show Spelling Errors Again After Too Many Mispelled Words
The best way to handle this is with the Proofing Language setting nether the Review tab. If you set the proper language for these problem words/names or select "do not check spelling or grammer" for them you will terminate getting the message.
Mastering the Spelling Checker
Volunteering to "pay forward" to return help I've received in the Microsoft user community.] Charles Kenyon Legal site: https://addbalance.com
Lord's day Prairie, Wisconsin
wordfaq[at]addbalance[dot]com
Was this answer helpful?
Distressing, I wasn't clear.
This is not an issue of setting the proper language under the review tab.
The proper names differ from the the master document language. The documents (and my PC) are all prepare to United kingdom English, but the subject area thing of each written report focuses on a different country. And so I have a number of geographic locations (generally small towns and villages) and a number of foreign authors appearing in an English language text. Also, because they're proper names, it really wouldn't matter what language I accept the PC/Discussion gear up to.
Further, turning off spell-checking is exactly what I'one thousand trying not to practise. Word is randomly (or has the appearance of randomness) of telling me there are too many spelling errors and then it'due south turning off spell checking for this document. This is the root of the question---how to not plough off spell check.
Was this reply helpful?
***This is not an issue of setting the proper language nether the review tab.
The proper names differ from the the primary document language. The documents (and my PC) are all set to UK English, but the subject matter of each written report focuses on a unlike country. So I have a number of geographic locations (mostly minor towns and villages) and a number of foreign authors appearing in an English text. Also, because they're proper names, it really wouldn't matter what linguistic communication I have the PC/Word set up to.
Farther, turning off spell-checking is exactly what I'm trying non to do. Word is randomly (or has the appearance of randomness) of telling me at that place are too many spelling errors and so it'south turning off spell checking for this document. This is the root of the question---how to not plough off spell check.
I do not agree.
This language setting is Not a setting for Word as a whole or for the document. Information technology is a setting that tin be applied to an private discussion. You lot can gear up a character style (that looks just similar the rest of your body text) to not bank check spelling or grammar. That way can be applied to the words/names that are triggering the spell checker. You tin even attach a keyboard shortcut to that way. I would advise keeping both the style and any keyboard shortcut stored in the certificate, non in your normal template.
The more triggers at that place are in your document, the more probable that it is you volition get the too many spelling errors message. You lot are not turning off spell check past doing this, simply rather telling Discussion to not check sure words.
Look at the portion of the article I linked on "Exempting specific text from spell checking." That is what I am talking well-nigh.
Volunteering to "pay forwards" to return help I've received in the Microsoft user community.] Charles Kenyon Legal site: https://addbalance.com
Dominicus Prairie, Wisconsin
wordfaq[at]addbalance[dot]com
Was this reply helpful?
Right, I go and appreciate what you're saying, but while it's appropriate for certain contexts, it'south definitely not for the questions I'm asking. To be articulate, I am familiar with the language setting of the PC and the general linguistic communication setting(s) of Word. I tin hands utilize different languages to unlike styles and tin can easily prepare whether or not northward particular fashion'due south spelling is checked at all. Almost all of my reports caput to a graphic designer before publishing, so I'm very familiar with tying style commands and macros to keyboard and mouse shortcuts.
But that'south non addressing the question I'm asking. Toggling the language or per-give-and-take spellcheck on the fly is a non-starter—the flagged words are peppered throughout the certificate then I would have to take an absurd amount of time to go through it line-by-line merely to set up it for editing. I mentioned in the OP that manually adding or ignoring on a case-past-instance basis was unworkable; irresolute the underlying style achieves the same end while being equally unworkable.
Once more, I'k admittedly non asking about how to arroyo this from an ad hoc word-by-word footing—I am not asking how to exempt individual words, whether through linguistic communication, toggling spell-checking, calculation it to my custom dictionary or flagging it 'ignore all'.
Instead, I am request if anyone knows what triggers this fault/bug on the global level, and what—if annihilation—tin exist done about it.
I am calling it an mistake or bug for 2 principal reasons. Start, it'southward unpredictably sporadic (to me). In the nowadays case, the document I am working on returned the error belatedly last nighttime. I saved/reopened/toggled 'hide spelling errors', and it was fine for several hours after that. Information technology happened again, I did the same fix, which lasted for simply one hour; I did information technology once again and information technology'due south been fine since. Sometimes the set lasts but a half 60 minutes; sometimes information technology lasts for days. As even so I can't effigy out what triggers it (hence the offset half of the OP) or how to ensure the fix lasts.
2d, the specs of my electric current machine are geared towards other tasks and absolutely dwarf Word requirements—it's not a matter of computational space whether from RAM, CPU ability/overhead, or storage. Further, other Part applications are able to keep rail of much larger and much more complicated datasets without blinking. And perhaps more indicative, my laptop (which is far less robust than my desktop) runs on Ubuntu and works on these documents via OpenOffice—which has a similarly powerful/in-depth spell checker, yet has never returned this error.
Then, I'one thousand trying to ask what is it that triggers the error? A gear up number of non-dictionary words combined with selecting a set amount of text? A change in view visibility? I have no idea; I take yet to discern a pattern. And second, if information technology is known what triggers this, are there any viable workarounds or approaches to the problem (salvage a 1980s arroyo to discussion processing)?
Was this reply helpful?
As you lot have surmised, I do non know the reply to that question. Suzanne Barnhill may.
I regularly apply a citation style which includes no proofing to instance name citations in legal work. This is not hard when washed as the certificate is prepared.
.
Volunteering to "pay forward" to render aid I've received in the Microsoft user customs.] Charles Kenyon Legal site: https://addbalance.com
Sun Prairie, Wisconsin
wordfaq[at]addbalance[dot]com
Was this reply helpful?
The bulletin/warning that Word displays simply means what it says: Word has found more spelling errors than information technology can display. If your primary goal is to get rid of the mistake bulletin, applying "Do not check spelling or grammar" formatting to the whole certificate is the easiest solution. I realize that it isn't what you want, because you notwithstanding desire to be able to spellcheck some words. The alternatives would hateful a lot of transmission work, as Charles has already mentioned.
Stefan Blom
Part Apps & Services (Word) MVP
Volunteer Moderator (Office)
~~~~
Please note that I practise not work for Microsoft
MVP program info: https://mvp.microsoft.com/
~~~~
Was this reply helpful?
Well, what triggers it is "besides many spelling errors." What we don't know is how many is "likewise many"; I suspect it depends on your system resource (RAM, free HD infinite, etc.). In any case, as Stefan says, the best way to retain your sanity (without having to add together all your "misspelled" words to the user dictionary) is to format the words as "Do not cheque spelling or grammar," every bit explained at http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/MasterSpellCheck.htm#ExemptingText.
I compiled a 600-page certificate primarily equanimous of transcriptions of letters to and from my father. My male parent's were relatively literate, but some of his correspondents were not very good spellers. I wanted to impress the letters unedited, and so I had to format a lot of actually misspelled words as No Proofing in society to take "Check spelling as you type" nevertheless functional so I could take hold of my own typos.
Microsoft MVP (Give-and-take) since 1999
Fairhope, Alabama United states of america
http://ssbarnhill.com
http://wordfaqs.ssbarnhill.com
Screen shots captured with TechSmith's Snagit
Was this answer helpful?
Cheers everyone. It seems it was a hard question to phrase and I call back I ended upward beating the poor horse.
I retrieve what makes the outcome so vexing isn't the general limitation (although from a technical standpoint, I must admit to being baffled past information technology—particularly with 18GB of RAM and tons of free SDD space, this should be a trivial limit to overcome. And given modern machines, that's really non all that special. And heck, even with a smaller amount of RAM I'd expect to get an out-of-retentivity fault (whoa, that hearkens back to Windows 98!) before a Word mistake—especially given its integration with other Function products.
So my idle curiosity wants to ask my database/programming friends what I'm missing math-wise as to what makes Word accept some sort of a relatively modest limit like this. I did a count (Pick.Range.SpellingErrors / .count) and there were nigh 2000 errors in a sub-50K document. Add in the size of Give-and-take'southward dictionary and perhaps it is a larger corporeality of processing than I expect.
Anyway, what really boggles my mind, what made me go on thinking information technology was something I was overlooking was the apparent randomness of it all. How I could be working on the same certificate for hours on end when POOF, here comes the error. And so it goes away. Then it comes back for a short while, then gone once more.
The transcription sounds similar a true labour of love. I love my work, simply it's a chip shy of my father'due south letters!
Was this reply helpful?
I should have said my late father's letters. These were from the period when he was merely starting his career and and then joining the army in January 1942 and so courting my female parent in 1943 (and a lot of the letters to him were from the girls who ultimately wrote him Honey John messages), then they were pretty interesting. I have another volume (756 pages) of the letters he wrote to my female parent the year he was in Italia later in the war (only after I was built-in). I printed/published the volumes just for interested family members, though I did share the war letters (on CD) with the WWII Museum in New Orleans and the Tennessee State Archives (he was a native Tennessean).
Microsoft MVP (Word) since 1999
Fairhope, Alabama United states of america
http://ssbarnhill.com
http://wordfaqs.ssbarnhill.com
Screen shots captured with TechSmith's Snagit
Was this reply helpful?
I think you have already got the only workable fix, create a grapheme style with no spell cheque. Just go comfortable with the appropriate keyboard/mouse shortcuts to select the offending text and use the style. Or get into the habit of periodically doing a spell bank check and applying the no spell cheque style to appropriate finds.
Sorry, we can't provide the specific triggers because MS has never published that sort of information (at least in recent memory). Hither is one of the few spec sheets they take published: https://support.microsoft.com/en-u.s.a./kb/211489
It doesn't have the data you are looking for.
Office apps like Word (and fifty-fifty Windows) have lots of historical "baggage". Decisions made in the lawmaking that made sense at the time, but are no longer relevant or advisable. The problem with making these types of pattern decisions using hard coded values is that fixing them in the future is hard.
If you expect in the link I provided above, you'll see some of the limits are based on binary values (max value a binary field can concur) and others are merely arbitrary.
.
*****
.
As computer scientists we are trained to communicate with the dumbest things in the world – computers –
so you'd retrieve nosotros'd exist able to communicate quite well with people.
Prof. Doug Fisher
Was this respond helpful?
Source: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/all/what-triggers-the-too-many-spelling-errors-message/8cf6e482-4210-402a-b271-60c781c3f723
0 Response to "How to Get Word to Show Spelling Errors Again After Too Many Mispelled Words"
Post a Comment